Wednesday, March 27, 2019

Jefferson and Hamilton Essay -- essays research papers

The post-revolutionary war period of the Unites States axiom the establish workforcet of the first party system and an enlarging gap in viewpoints mingled with the wealthy and the common homo. The contradictory views of Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson were primarily trusty for the pinch of political parties from 1783-1800.Alexander Hamilton exerted the most influence in the natural Federalist Party. He believed that only an enlightened ruling class could produce a stable and effective federal governance. The government therefore needed the take hold of wealthy men. Thomas Jefferson and the republicans defended more(prenominal) the rights of the common man and an agrarian monastic order with little power from the federal government. His basic principle was "in common I believe the decisions of the wad in a body testament be more honest and more disinterested than those of wealthy men."The Republican Party attracted more of the common people while the Fede ralist Party displace support from the aristocracy. Although neither side was willing to admit to it, these institutions were known as the "first party system." Both parties stance on who should have more power in the government contributed to the largely divers views of the common man and the wealthy man.When the cut Revolution grew to its most radical peak the Federalists reacted with execration as citizens overthrew the aristocracy. In launching the New Ship of State Hamilton said, "The practice of France is compared with that of America during its late Revolution. I own I do non like the comparison...well informed men must equally unite in the doubt whether this free and good government be likely to take place." Thomas Jeffersons answer was "I still hope the Revolution will issue happily...The dyspeptic of the whole earth was depending on the issue of the contest, and was ever such a prize won with so little innocent blood?" numerous Republicans e ven imitated French Jacobins in dress and in speaking. The difference betwixt the Federalist and Republican social philosophies is most easily seen among their different reactions to the French Revolution. Federalists called for a national debt to be funded and hoped to throw a large national vernacular credited by wealthy men. He defended it in a protrude presented to Congress by claiming "where the authority of the government is general it can create corp... ...Sedition Acts exercise a power nowhere delegated to the Federal government...this commonwealth does adjudge that the said foreigner and Sedition Acts are violations of the said Constitution." The resolutions nullified the laws and contributed to the rise of Republicanism and the fall of Federalism. The differing opinions on how the government in the post-Revolutionary war period should be run ultimately created the first rise in political parties. The Federalist thought in a government run by wealthy men and opposing Republican support for and agrarian society split the nations people in support of a government most beneficial to them. Differing reactions to the French Revolution showed the distinct difference in Federalist and Republican belief of who the government should be run under. The National Bank and the excise tax on liquor revealed differing views on how strictly the Constitution should be interpreted and the Alien and Sedition Acts reveal an attempt of one party to dissolve another. The separate views of Hamiltons Federalism and Jeffersons Republicanism were the ultimate contributors to splitting the nation on views and establishing the first political parties.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.