Pen Marked Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

Pen Marked - Essay ExampleThis discussion is an application of the shouts of small mentation in Penn-Mart case memo or case study.Before applying the steps of critical thinking in Penn-Mart case study, it would be important to outline the benefits of critical thinking. Browne and Keeley (2014) notes that critical thinking helps individuals react decisively, reexamine and critic a presented material. In this respect, applying critical thinking in Penn-Mart memo forms the basis for its review and criticism. ground on the writers articulation of ideas and conclusions, the reader washbowl either accept or reject the presented material.The first step of critical thinking as presented by Browne and Keeeley (2014) is identification of the issue and conclusion of the subject matter. In other words, this step involves identification of the argument, hypothesis and the projected or anticipated communication. To identifying the issue, Browne and Keeley (2014) advises that one ought to sm ooth and raise questions in regards to what the writer is responding or reacting to. In this respect, the issue in Penn-Marts case is the escalating expenditure in terms of wellnesscare benefits for the employees. Conversely, there must also be the identification of the conclusion in critical thinking. This involves a reflection on what the author of the material is seeks to establish (Browne and Keeley, 2014). In this case, the conclusion of Penn-Mart case can be deduced from the objective of the proposed Get Well program. It is the belief of the writer that improving employees awareness of their individual health status and subsequently assisting them identify health problems that could be alleviated or lessened by mode of individual improvement approaches would significantly reduce the costs incurred by Penn-Mart through healthcare benefits. The writer intelligibly defines the issue and conclusion.The second step of critical thinking is identification of the rationale (Browne a nd Keeley, 2014). This